Pilots
Italy
The buildings are located on the outskirts, in densely populated areas and where there are numerous other social housing buildings.
Denmark
Both at the pilot-site in Herning and Aalborgthe buildings are mixed building types, from cluster houses to multi-storey buildings.
Slovenia
The proposed building is located in the suburbs of a small town called Trbovlje.
Trbovlje is the 9th largest city in Slovenia in terms of population.
Latest News
SUPER-i Releases Four Factsheets to Advance Knowledge on Energy Efficiency in Social Housing
SUPER-i, a project dedicated to driving sustainable practices in social housing, publishes four comprehensive factsheets (technical policy, financial, and environmental ) that are designed to support stakeholders in decision-making and
FB Launches Pilot Rewilding Project for SUPERSHINE to Transform Green Areas and Engage Local Community
As part of its commitment to sustainability through the SUPERSHINE pilot project, FB is pioneering efforts to rewild common green areas in collaboration with local stakeholders. This initiative, set in
Powering inclusion to fuel democracy: the energy efficiency factor
About 47 million EU citizens can’t afford to heat their homes, with high material costs and poor financing options blocking renovations. But the impact of energy efficiency goes beyond just
Financial Tables
In this empirical analysis, we provide a comprehensive study to investigate the economic and financial feasibility of the energy efficiency interventions in Italy, Slovenia and Denmark. More specifically, we derive the adjusted risk extra returns (RP) for each Public Private Partnership(PPP) contract and we then determine the most appropriate contract for each building.
Detailed cost-benefit analysis of the various PPPs is provided within each specific pilot.
Comparison Public Private Partnerships (PPP) across pilots
The table below summarises the ranking of the financial performance of each Public Private Partnership for each building across the SUPER-i pilots in Denmark, Italy and Slovenia.
| Country | Building | PPP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Shared Savings |
Guaranteed Savings |
Direct Credit Line
|
Energy Supply Contract |
|
Italy |
Boito
|
2nd |
1st Choice |
4rd |
3rd |
|
Montasio |
1st Choice |
3rd |
4th |
2nd |
|
|
Denmark |
Borlgumparken |
1st Choice |
3rd |
2nd |
4th |
|
Afdeling |
3rd |
1st Choice |
2nd |
4th |
|
|
Vaevergarden |
1st Choice |
2nd |
4th |
3rd |
|
|
Stoorgarden |
1st Choice |
2nd |
3rd |
4th |
|
|
Hummerthor
|
1st Choice |
2nd |
3rd |
4th |
|
|
Frisenborgparken |
2nd |
1st Choice |
4th |
3rd |
|
|
Slovenia |
|
1st choice |
2nd |
4th |
3rd |
Ranking for risk adjusted extra return
The risk adjusted extra return is a financial investment measure that determines the expected investment return that exceeds the risk free rate of return. That is, RP represents the level of compensation that the investor receives for taking the extra risk associated with a given investment
The table below provides a ranking system for risk-adjusted extra returns (RP) and their corresponding assessments, offering a valuable framework for evaluating the performance of each PPP contract based on different RP ranges, from ‘reasonable’ to ‘excellent’.
| Ranking for risk adjusted Extra return | ||
|---|---|---|
|
0.75 < RP < 0.95 |
5 |
reasonable |
|
0.95 < RP < 1.5 |
6 |
very reasonable |
|
1.5 < RP < 2.0 |
7 |
good |
|
2.0 < RP < 3.0 |
8 |
very good |
|
RP > 3.0 |
9 |
excellent |
